Sunday, April 12, 2015

Homeschoolers and gay lovers

Dear Hannah,

I heard someone express one time that a good number of Disney/Pixar films were aimed at getting children to come out of the closet.  I'm not so certain, after considering not only the number of gay people employed by Pixar, but the overwhelming theme of their films, that this person was being completely paranoid.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Insanity in Indiana

Dear Hannah,

Due to a recent law protecting the rights of Indiana's business-owners, in what has got to be the bravest political move in Seattle history, our mayor has finally decided to stop funding the extremely large number of city employee trips to Indiana.  This has left us wondering what he's going to do next.  If he's going to equal the heroism of this current measure, will he stop all our city-funded flights to Pakistan, in support of women's rights?  Or maybe to Egypt, in support of the Coptic Christians suffering there?  Like the size of our mayor's heart and cajones, the limits are endless. 

Saturday, March 28, 2015

A trip to hell and back

Dear Hannah,

Last night I dreamed I ate a poisonous flower with a hundred soft white petals.  Everyone was doing it, so it seemed reasonable to go along with them.  And our reasoning for eating it was simple: we were all going to die anyway -- everyone dies, you know -- and this was the easiest way to get it over with.  And so I did it.

Friday, March 20, 2015

How to celebrate International Women's Day

Dear Hannah,

Of all the classes I took in college, English 201 and Health stand out the most.  And I think the reason is because in English 201 we spent nearly all our time trying to misunderstand the English language, and in health class we spent nearly all our time trying not to catch venereal diseases.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Tyler Durden

Dear Hannah,

Right after Fight Club came out on DVD, my friends and I used to get high on all kinds of things and throw punches on the streets of Italy.  We had rules, because we were too sensible to get hurt too badly: no punches to the face, and nothing below the belt.  If someone wanted out, we let him.  I don't remember anyone fighting any girls, which would have been embarrassing for both parties, whether the man won or lost.  But the point of the matter was that however ridiculous Fight Club looks now, it had an impact on nearly every young man who saw it.  I saw it with nerds who ranted and raved about it in between matches of Starcraft; I pretended it with punks and stoners who acted it under the influence of ecstasy and cocaine.  Nobody who admired the film -- from the jocks to the preps to the band kids -- was like Tyler Durden.  Everyone, on some level, wanted to be like him.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Some thoughts on The Black Eyed Peas

Dear Hannah,

You're probably already aware of this, but ever since the 1970's at the very earliest, popular culture has run in 20-year cycles.  I'm now old enough to have consciously experienced three of them. Nobody in the 1960's was interested in the 1940's, but in the 1980's, everyone was excited about the 60's.  In in the 2000's, which is the cultural revival I experienced the most personally, everyone went wild for the 80's.  A period of twenty years gives something exactly enough time to be unpopular; just enough unpopularity to mean that none of the kids will have heard it, and exactly enough time to remind 30 year-olds about the times they used to be interesting -- a perfect recipe for a band to go on an embarrassing reunion tour.  In ten years everyone will go wild for the 2000's, which means I should probably get ahead of them and try to start explaining The Black Eyed Peas.  I can't do anything to explain emo.  Aside from a few isolated hits, the whole of it was garbage.  In certain ways, emo was characteristic of my generation.  To my knowledge, it marked the first time in history that an entire genre was comprised of and defined by an excess of bitching.

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

All romance is tragic

Dear Hannah,

In my last letter I told you that I was born with a certain set of inclinations.  What I didn't tell you is that not all of them have changed.  When I was about sixteen years old, I stopped dreaming about war.  My dreams about romance, on the other hand, seem to have gotten much more frequent, and far more complex.  Honestly, I would have preferred it the other way around. 

Monday, March 2, 2015

Concerning war and women

Dear Hannah,

When I was a young boy, there were really two things that occupied my mind for the majority of the day.  The first was war, and the second was women.  Depending on the day, their priority might have been reversed.

Saturday, February 21, 2015

How to tell if you're in a relationship

Dear Hannah,

Since it might seem suspicious if you keep hearing about the good things I dream, but none of the bad things I do, it might be wise to throw in a confession every now and then, so you can know you're dealing with a real person.  So here it is: my confession.

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Why papa is vain

Dear Hannah,

One of the great difficulties of publishing my thoughts has been that some people have called me arrogant.  I actually had two people say I was full of myself within the same week -- a horrible week.  It's always good to hear someone call you out on your faults, especially when there might be an inkling of truth to it; it's better than going your whole life being a self-absorbed ass and everyone thinking it except yourself.  In this sense, we can learn more from our enemies than our friends.  They'll sometimes tell us things that our friends won't, because an enemy's happiness doesn't rely on ours.  Even if an insult is undeserved, sometimes it allows us some good reflection, which may result in our improvement of a virtue we already had.  Always listen to your enemies.  They may do you more good than you realize.

Monday, February 16, 2015

A toast to Bill Clinton

Dear Hannah,

I know it sounds strange to say -- and maybe we should keep this a secret from my dad -- but one of the presidents I'm happy to think about is Bill Clinton.  To be completely honest, I don't know much about anything he did as president, because I was too young to be paying attention.  What does make me happy is that he proves to me, on some level, that we have evolved significantly in our ideas about women.

Monday, February 9, 2015

In defense of a beautiful boss

Dear Hannah,

It shouldn't come as any surprise that someone out there writing for The Economist has a problem with the size and looks of our bosses.  Leftists have been waging a war against nearly every personal advantage for years: if they aren't upset because your parents are rich, they'll insult you because your parents are white, or maybe because you have a penis.  In their most unreasonable moments, they might even be upset that you deserve your own job.  It seems only reasonable to expect that sooner or later, they would be complaining that some of our bosses are good-looking, and that they keep themselves in shape. 

Saturday, February 7, 2015

But a white man did it too!

Dear Hannah,

Every time I've seen an article about ISIS lighting a man on fire, I'm reminded about how adorable our modern popes have gotten.  It's almost enough to make you want to pat Papa Francesco on his head. Nearly everyone in the West is well familiar with the Catholic church -- at least, with their burning people alive during the time when they had the most power (which also happens to be the time when they abused their power the most).  The funny thing is that we're reminded of it now, when people who aren't even Catholics are burning people who aren't really heretics; in other words, we bring it up at a time when it isn't really helpful.  Just like we bring up the time when white people used to torch black people before Americans wised up and began persecuting our own murderers.  A smart person might almost be led to believe these experiences would make us more likely to condemn the psychotics; but others, unfortunately, find it more enlightening to relate to them.  It almost makes you wonder whether, if somebody from another race or religion tries to rape any of our girlfriends, we'll end up hearing about great-grandpa Gideon throwing a sack over a mountain woman's head and forcing her to marry him (although I think this was called Seven Brides for Seven Brothers, and Gideon might argue that he was only behaving like Plutarch's account of Romulus).

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

God's orphan

Dear Hannah,

In the world of compliments, I've found you can screw things up in one of two ways.  The first is by giving a compliment that's too unimpressive to be a compliment at all; and the second is to give a compliment that's so impressive, it makes the recipient feel unworthy of it.

Monday, February 2, 2015

Katy Perry

Dear Hannah,

As I watched the Superbowl the other day, I was reminded of something I've always hated to remember: that it isn't nearly as easy to dress an ugly woman up and make her beautiful, as it is to dress a beautiful woman up and make her ugly.

Friday, January 23, 2015

Ayn Rand

Dear Hannah,

If you want a perfect recipe for disaster, try homeschooling a young boy in a military community in a country where he can't speak the language.  If you really want to succeed, do it for the majority of his teenage years.  Homeschooling will isolate him from the majority of children; the military community will snatch nearly everyone he loves from him within two to three years.  Not speaking the language will make him feel a profound and unspeakable disconnection with the overwhelming majority of people he sees.  He'll feel alone, even in the middle of a flourishing Italian suburb.

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

A hasty and general review of Game of Thrones

Dear Hannah,

Since I'm about done with the fourth season, I suppose I owe someone an explanation for having begun to watch Game of Thrones in the first place.  I'd sworn it off for years now, only to prove that I'm not the kind of man who should be swearing anything.  If it wasn't for marriage and business, I wouldn't believe in vows at all.  They work out fine for men like David and Jonathan, who pledged each other their mutual devotion, because their souls were knit together.  But then there's Jepthah, who vowed to sacrifice the first thing that left his front door if he won a war, and then ended up sacrificing his daughter.  Some people think it's sexist that Mosaic Law prohibits women from making vows without their husband's consent, and it may very well be -- perhaps toward men.  The idea that women can express their ecstasies and sorrows in ridiculous vows and not find themselves bound to something which, being made in the heat of the moment, has every ability to ruin their lives later, you would think a greater benefit than an insult (although I can conceive of its being an insult to the intelligence of women).  Both sexes, after all, are capable of being rash.  But enough on Biblical vows and feminism.

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Morris the fraud

Dear Hannah,

Now, I wouldn't consider myself an enemy of Robert Morris, but I'm becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the things that come out of his face.  A short while ago I heard his sermon about speaking in tongues, when he said something I've never heard before in my entire life: that people who begin speaking in tongues aren't immediately fluent in them.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Concerning the pornography in Game of Thrones

Dear Hannah,

There was really only one reason why I hadn't started watching Game of Thrones until now, and it's the same reason anyone with a healthy amount of decency wouldn't watch it.  It also happens to be the same reason why anyone with a healthy amount of modesty wouldn't tell anyone they've seen it.  The show's full of porn. 

Sunday, December 21, 2014

King Louie

Dear Hannah,

One thing that's come into fashion lately has been people's tendency to mock Disney characters for being "racist."  Nobody questions whether the crows in Dumbo might have been modeled after real musicians of the era, and nobody questions whether there really were (at some point in a bygone era) Indians like the ones in Peter Pan.  Apparently nobody has ever ridden the Washington State ferry system and seen old pictures of actual Indians.  It's almost enough to make you wonder what Millenials think when they go to an Americanized Chinese restaurant.  Is it more racist to call Chinese what they aren't actually, or more racist to call them what they are?  Or is it racist to pretend Chinese people have certain kinds of food at all?  Maybe someday we'll live in a world where all the different races act completely the same way, so that everyone can pretend to be more diverse without any stereotypes.  But I don't see how this could help us find good food.

Monday, December 15, 2014

In defense of the word "thug"

Dear Hannah,

I've lived many places throughout my life, and this one, situated in the South, happens to be one of the worst.  And I say this because, on the right side of me and on the left, I'm neighbored by a racist, and a redneck (respectively).  The latter parks his trucks on the grass and plays his Luke Bryan late into the evening, and enjoys getting into fights with his girlfriend -- who could very possibly be his sister.  The racist, on the other hand, presents a different kind of problem.  He hates everything to do with any race except his own; which is unfortunate for me, because I'm a half-bred Hispanic.  He believes everyone other than his own race is against him: the Asians have taken his child's place at college because they study harder, the Mexicans have taken his job because they've outclassed him in price and work habit.  And lastly, perhaps worst of all, he believes that whenever something bad happens between black people and white people in the national news, the black people are innocent, and the white people, whose minds he cannot read, are racists.  Oh -- I've forgotten to mention something.  This racist neighbor is black.

Monday, December 8, 2014

Hitler's art and functional alcoholism

Dear Hannah,

Walk through any bookstore in the United States, find the history section, shuffle your way toward "Germany," and you'll be treated to almost nothing but information about the Nazis.  It shouldn't be too surprising why.  Most of the Protestants I know aren't concerned enough about their own religion to think heroes like Martin Luther are interesting, and Hitler was the most exciting supervillain to have happened only yesterday.  Aside from these two periods, and maybe World War 1 and the invasion of Rome by the Goths, the rest of German history is a gigantic void to Americans. 

Sunday, December 7, 2014

The cheerful worker

Dear Hannah,

I don’t care what people say — I refuse to believe that a man who’s a drag at work is a good man in whole.  Eight hours a day are spent at work, at the very least; eight hours are spent at home, and eight hours are spent sleeping — at least, if a man is sensible enough to get himself some sleep.  Work may only be a third of a man’s entire day, but it is half of his waking hours, and if a man’s a drag to be around for half a day, I say he’s entirely bad — especially if that’s the only portion of the day I see him.

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Concerning Rick Grimes's beard

Dear Hannah,

I've been watching the Walking Dead for a few weeks now, and aside from the constant tension between pity and practicality, one thing that's stuck out to me is the development (or undevelopment) of Rick Grimes' personal appearance.  At the beginning he was a perfectly good-looking man -- clean-shaved, hair cut close, fit as can be.  You could say he was an ideal American in both way and form.  But then all of a sudden he grew his beard and hair a little longer and now he looks like a mess.  From an artistic perspective, having him look like a mess may have been a good idea.  People have a way of getting messy looking when they're in a mess; as Rick's emotional state continues to plummet, his physical appearance follows right behind him. 

Monday, October 20, 2014

In defense of something I said at dinner last night

Dear Hannah,

You were too young to remember, but there was one time when my parents took us out to dinner, and everything was going fine until I opened my mouth.  I have a tendency to do this; sometimes I've been thinking about something for a long time, and when I end up speaking about it, I forget to explain it, and then I look like a monster.  I suppose next time, I should make sure to explain it.  Better yet, I should keep my mouth shut.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

The Devil's Christianity

Dear Hannah,

It might be prudent to confess, before getting too far along with this essay, that I have nothing against Pope Francis except his politics.  It isn't that he's rude or selfish or uninspiring; anyone with half a brain knows that Pope Francis is one of the kindest and most exciting public figures we've had in a while.  I simply have a problem with him saying horrible things, like that he knows many good Communists.

Monday, October 13, 2014

How to safely be a heretic

Dear Hannah,

The other day I was accosted by the first militant Jew I've ever met.  I've heard of militant Jews for years now; the ones in wide-brimmed hats and ridiculous curls who go around "shaming" people for turning on light switches and spitting on the Sabbath.  I've lived long enough now to know that it's always better to meet religious people before making judgments about them: I heard terrible things about the Mormons for years, and then I found out they were some of the greatest neighbors in the world (at least, they are in Seattle).  But anyone who thinks he's morally superior for not eating shrimp or wearing polyester is already too unbearable for my taste. Thankfully, I'm not alone.  Jesus seems to have agreed with me. 

Saturday, October 4, 2014

On Calvinism

Dear Hannah,

I don't remember ever directly encountering the 5 Points of Calvinism in Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion, but here they are, in case you aren't sure you remember them.

Total Depravity
Unconditional Election
Limited Atonement
Irresistible Grace
Perseverance of the Saints

They mean, in essence,
1) That from the second you're born, you're in a position of damnation
2) That God chose you to be saved regardless of anything you'd ever do
3) That God only chose some of us, and then damned the rest
4) That you don't have a choice in your salvation
5) That once you're saved, you'll always be saved

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

How to avoid tv dinners and a lonely death

Dear Hannah,

I'm sure you've heard me tell you about the way your great grandpa Don died, but I want to remind you about him because I think the story proves something a lot of people forget.  We can all theorize about ways we'd like to live; history reminds us that others have tried things and ended up a certain way.  And however much we loved him, your great grandpa was certainly such a case.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

On an untimely death (classic essay, reprinted)

Dear Hannah,

One of the most strange and backward things a person could say is that another person’s death was untimely.  Of course, there's really only one timely time for a person to die, and that is when he does.  All other times are incredibly out of place.

But words don't always mean what they appear to mean, and if phrases may be symbols for other things which we actually mean, it seems more reasonable to translate untimely with we were not expecting him to die at this time, something which is still strange to say.  And it's strange because it insists that what we expect of reality is that it curbs to our expectations, which is really the opposite of the truth: our very survival teaches us that our expectations must curb to meet reality, or we will end up dying.

Of course, the reality of the matter is that we may die at any time, and that living life without a healthy and sober view of death is something someone should only do if he considers his life unimportant: in other words, it's the mindset he should embrace if he wants to live his life without any care or concern for his soul, or without any urgency in love and selflessness.  To live as though we have time has nothing to do with whether we do; it has to do with pretending something other than that we don’t.

The Christian knows there's a better way to think about this whole scenario, and that a sensible position on the matter contains multiple axioms.  The first is that God has put eternity in man’s heart, as the Preacher says, which means (in a roundabout way) that we are inclined toward thinking about living as though we can live forever.  The second is that God has appointed a time for us to die, and that we have nothing to do with averting His will (Matthew 10:29).  And if these two statements may be taken in combination, the Christian can only come to to conclusion that man’s most natural tendency is to delude himself about a death which is inevitable, so that he can do things which should be considered avoidable.  And if we are to live Christian lives, and enter into our Father’s presence hearing that well done, thou good and faithful servant, we must teach ourselves and one another, with a healthy dose of history and Scripture, that however long we think we will live, that we are going to die — and that it is likely sooner than we think.

Your father,

Monday, September 8, 2014

On menstruation

Dear Hannah,

I'm absolutely certain that it was my anthropology professor who told me that in certain bushman cultures, a menstruating woman is put into a hut until she stops menstruating.  What I'm not certain about is whether quarantining a menstruating woman is a good idea.

Sunday, August 31, 2014

What kind of men are we?

Dear Hannah,

One of the strangest periods of Roman history was the period right before the republic collapsed and became an empire.  The Romans weren't known for losing, but during this period, they lost nearly everything they put their hands to.  Catiline nearly overthrew the republic by rallying profligates, whoremongers, and drunken hipsters under the flag of rapacity.  A Numidian king named Jugurtha practically walked into the Senate, bribed a bunch of senators, and caused them to overlook his hostile foreign policy -- which cost a friendly kingdom its ruin; and pirates practically owned the seas, so that all sea trade had practically stopped.  Nothing was fought for, everything was bought.  Money, and not honor, was the currency; safety was lost for safety's sake. Jugurtha was told by the Romans themselves that everything was for sale in Rome, and he proved them right.  Rome itself was plunder until Pompey arrived and in a moment of manliness and decision cleared the seas of pirates; the republic was lost to Catiline until Cicero shouted like an angry patriot and placed his own life in danger to save it.  Rome was bought until Metellus and Marius arrived, denying the bribes of Jugurtha, and actually decided to stand by their friends. 

Friday, August 29, 2014

Against the Christian sourpuss

Dear Hannah,

I just realized, this morning, that the reason I've been having a difficult time wanting to be a Christian isn't because of Christianity, but because of other Christians.  To give a single example, Victoria Osteen recently made a silly speech about how Christianity and church and religion in general is about us being happy, which seems perfectly reasonable to me.  The problem is, the most "serious" Christians were quick to respond that Christianity isn't about our happiness.

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

On sin and sin nature

Dear Hannah,

As I've been watching you these past few weeks, I've noticed we have a lot in common.  Neither of us likes to be slighted, or to be ignored; neither of us likes to be laughed at, or to have to share.  Each of us enjoys doing the things we want to do, and neither of us likes doing the things that we don't; and we both enjoy asserting our own authority -- rules be damned.  And what I've realized from watching you for so long isn't that you're a horrible person for wanting to do things your own way: I've simply come to the realization that I'm a baby who's learned how to reason.  Twenty-nine years ago I wanted nearly the same things I want today; I simply learned how to reason to get them, and to do it in the most social way possible.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Why papa drinks

Dear Hannah,

It's strange to think that people drink because they want to feel things they wouldn't otherwise.  It isn't just the numbness of a buzz that attracts us to drinking; it's that drinking makes us like things we wouldn't otherwise like, enjoy conversations we might not otherwise have had, ignore fears we might otherwise have felt, celebrate people around whom we'd otherwise be bored.  It makes us care about things we wouldn't normally care about, and give things away that we might have never given.  Some people even drink to be more comfortable with an aspect of themselves that they hate (although I would argue that this is a bad reason for drinking).  In a certain sense, intoxication does make us more charitable, whatever fun I made of the Rastafarians earlier.  It adds a certain humanity (at least to some of us) that we'd been missing all along.  A negative person might say that drinking allows us to live a life we wouldn't otherwise have lived; a more sensible person might say that drinking allows us to enjoy the life we already have. 

Monday, August 18, 2014

On Saints

Dear Hannah,

You're perfectly welcome to read books about the attributes of God.  I personally think they wouldn't do you any harm, although I would also argue that they're unlikely to do you much good.  The unfortunate truth about these kinds of books is that we're humans, and they ramble on about all kinds of things that are so far beyond our nature that we can't make any sense of them.  In a way, reading "attributes" books about how God is just and merciful and omnipotent and eternal is almost like reading fairy tales.  Virtues, after all, are the things we've seen with our own eyes and touched with our own hands; which is why the Gospels are essential to our religion, and why speculative theology books are almost entirely nonsense.

Friday, August 8, 2014

A crisis averted

Dear Hannah,

You might be interested in knowing that had you been a boy, you probably would have been named Saul.  In retrospect it would have been a terrible idea, made during a period of religious fervor -- or maybe it was a period of fanaticism.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

On spirituality

Dear Hannah,

As the popular tendency is to try and force you into one of two camps, especially in the world of politics, you might have considered by this point whether you're more spiritual or religious.  If you want to know what these terms were originally intended to mean, people are supposed to be asking whether you follow your own heart and your senses (which is supposed to be a compliment), or whether you follow other people's rules (which is supposed to be an insult); but what it really concerns nowadays is whether you're liberal or conservative.  Since this is what people usually mean, I would argue that we're more a religious than a spiritual people; and maybe then, even more a political people.  We rarely check to see whether people are thinking, seeking, studying, or even whether they can explain the things they say they believe: we care more about whether they agree with a certain ideology, and then we call them spiritual.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

The problem with the Song of Solomon

Dear Hannah,

If anyone really wants to know what the most interesting thing about the Song of Solomon is, I wouldn't tell him, like our dear, late friend Mr. Caldecott, that it's interesting because of its physical position in the Bible.  It may be true that it's halfway through the Bible; it may be true that God's passionate love for us is central to the meaning of the Bible, and that the Song of Solomon is a powerful allegory about God's desire.  But if anyone was to ask me why it's really interesting, I would tell them it's because Solomon was already married when he pursued the Shulamite.

Sunday, July 20, 2014

To catch a prince: a treatise on male sexuality

Dear Hannah,

I want to apologize in advance for this essay: it's certainly not anything a girl wants to hear from anyone, much less from her father; but I figure that if there's anything worse than an honest letter about male sexuality, it's a woman never being told how men think, and then finding out from experience.  One of the greatest cruelties of human existence is showing a girl lots of romantic Disney films and never acquainting her with Solomon -- or in other words, giving her an ideal picture of the beginnings of romance, and never telling her that men are sexually insatiable.  They say Solomon loved his wives, and this much may be true.  But it's very easy to love a beautiful woman and treat her well for a moment when you get to share the rest of your week with as many as a thousand other beautiful women.  For the rest of us who deal with one exclusively, loving your wife is an entirely more laborious task.  Solomon's love, however admirable, is really a matter of timing.

Sunday, July 13, 2014

A case of accidental glorification

Dear Hannah,

This morning I happened to find an article on Rachel Maddow's Facebook page about a new voting law in North Carolina.  Now, it's easy to guess what her position was on the matter, because nearly every leftist says the same thing: she believed that the voting law was aimed at preventing minorities from voting, and the article was addressed particularly to the black community.  The truth about the law was, of course, that the law was aimed at illegal immigrants in the Hispanic community -- which is a perfectly reasonable law to pass when foreign nationals are threatening to upset an election.  But the most interesting thing about the complaints was, they had nothing to do with language tests or anything other than having a valid ID and being prepared to vote.

Saturday, June 21, 2014

On passion

Dear Hannah,

Ask yourself whether a man who loses sleep over a woman, who can't eat, who gives her everything he has, thinks about her day and night, places himself in danger, vows to love her forever, and commits suicide because of her has a problem, or whether he's Romeo.  The answer is obvious: he's a Romeo if the target of his affections loves him back, and a psychotic if she doesn't.  He has exactly the same disease either way; our perspective on the disease's usefulness determines whether we give him praise and a play, or censure and a straitjacket.

Monday, June 16, 2014

A great injustice

Dear Hannah,

I want you to take a good look at these pictures: really take a moment and study them. The one on the left is a portrait of Jonathan Edwards, quite possibly the greatest theologian who ever lived; a man who spurred an important religious revival and left behind him generations of doctors, lawyers, pastors and statesmen.  The portrait on the right is Jean-Jacques Rousseau, quite possibly the greatest and most dangerous author of the French Enlightenment; a man who spurred the massacres of the French Revolution, and left behind him scores of bastard children.

Ignoring their accomplishments and just looking at the two of them, who  would you rather be like?  Who would you rather be around? The frumpy sourpuss on the left, or the kind-eyed and handsome man on the right?

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Kill a child, save the planet

Dear Hannah,

I've heard strangers say perhaps a dozen times, that if the Native Americans had only kept control of the Americas, that the environment would be in much better shape -- but I think this is only half a truth.  It isn't so much that Native Americans were very good at taking care of the environment; it's more that they were very bad at taking care of their children. 

Saturday, June 14, 2014

On Pharisees

Dear Hannah,

By now, if you've spent any amount of time with Christians, you've heard them toss the term Pharisee around.  Also by now, if you've spent any time thinking, you've realized that the term Pharisee is used by Christians as frequently and unfairly as the term Hitler is used by political activists.  In essence, everyone who is doing better than us, who's asking us to take things more seriously, or who's asking us to do things differently than we're currently doing them, is a Pharisee.  We would do much better to recognize that the people most like the Pharisees -- or, in other words, the people most resembling their prejudices, their follies, and their theological imbecility -- are the ultra-orthodox Jews.  But then I suppose we would be in danger of being called Hitler.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Fabius and Minucius

Dear Hannah,

As I'm thinking about the many different angles I could approach the topic of repentance, none seems more useful to me than an old story about a Roman general named Fabius Maximus.  Now, Fabius was an old and experienced man when Hannibal invaded Italy, and the Romans spent a lot of time deriding him because he refused to engage Hannibal's army.  Fabius knew that Hannibal's army was too experienced and too powerful to be defeated by the Romans -- he knew, almost by instinct, that the best way to beat Hannibal would be to avoid an engagement, and let the invading army starve itself to death, even though it meant letting Hannibal ravage the country.  But the rest of the Romans disagreed, thinking it was too cowardly to hide in the mountains like Fabius wanted, and they decided it would be better to risk an open engagement.

Monday, June 9, 2014

Against charity monsters

Dear Hannah,

The other day I saw a video of some men being shot in the back of the head.  They were all lined up by some Syrian Islamists, for whatever reason I wasn't sure; but whether they committed crimes against humanity or simply "offenses" against fanatics, there they were, brains all out on the floor, and nobody around to do anything about it. 

Friday, June 6, 2014

On free will

Dear Hannah,

I know I just recently wrote you an essay about how people who discuss concepts like the freedom of the will are wasting their time; but my advice, as all general advice, is not always as simple as it seems.  The fact that there are some things we can't entirely understand doesn't mean that we shouldn't think about them; it simply means we should be careful we don't base our entire lives upon the speculative when there's a very high likelihood it can be proven false by what's demonstrative.

Our lives are really a mixture between speculation and common sense: our senses tell us all the causes and effects of the world around us, which become knowledge; our minds remember what we've seen and predict the future, and when they do so correctly, it's known as wisdom.  But when our minds apply these patterns to other things we haven't entirely experienced, and then we begin to think about things we haven't ever really seen, this is known as speculation.  You rely on either of these extremes too heavily, and you're a dolt.  Too much common sense means no dreaming; too much speculation means no wisdom.  Too much of the former means we never improve what we know, too much of the latter means we never maintain what we have.   Maybe Farmer Joe will never fall for an egalitarian ponzi scheme or become a practically retarded theologian, but I have a hard time believing he could have ever written The Federalist.  And maybe Einstein will invent all kinds of new things, but I have a hard time believing how this could be a real benefit to him when he let his family go to ruin.  The truth is that we need both kinds of men; but we should never try to be them -- although if I had to be one of the two, I would rather be (and be surrounded by) the simpleton with common sense. 

Monday, June 2, 2014

The problem with theologians

Dear Hannah,

The more I think about the phrase common sense, the more convinced I am that the people who have least to do with it are theologians.  Common sense is, of course, an allusion to our hearing and sight, and an implication that if we're seeing and hearing things, then we must be coming to some kind of an obvious understanding about what they mean.  The theologian has nothing to do with any of this.  He spends his time arguing about things he's never really seen from Someone he's never really heard.  Even Job was honest enough to say, when he finally met his Creator, that all the while he'd been talking about someone he'd never really met (Job 42:5-6).  The theologian in this sense is slightly less honest: the more seriously he takes his profession, the more you'd think he got his creeds from God in person.

Friday, May 30, 2014

An addict's paradise

Dear Hannah,

There are really only two problems with doing drugs.  The first, and most serious, is that they put you out of your right mind, which means you might do something stupid.  The second, but almost equally obnoxious problem, is that at some point you will have to stop doing them, which means that you will be miserable when you aren't.  The first would almost be tolerable, if it weren't for the second.  There are a lot of things human beings will put up with, so long as they're high; this is why drug addicts have filthy houses and eat disgusting food and have sex with all the worst people -- because they've made up for these losses by being too high to care.