Dear
M,
Black
Elk Speaks is
supposed to be a spiritual classic for American Indians — and not
just for his tribe, but for all of them. It's so far advanced
in this direction that now, almost a hundred years after its first
publication, it's beginning to get its own schools of theology, and a
horde of uninspiring idiots argue about its most obscure passages.
But this is how it goes. Inspiration leads to confusion leads
to policy. The Spirit gives life, and the letter kills it.
Black Elk himself, so far as I
can tell, was touched in some measure by God — or at the very least
by some lesser demon. By the time whiteboy John G. Neihardt
wrote this book, Black Elk was an old blind man in the 1930’s.
No fellow Indian had bothered to record him, or if they did bother,
they had no talent to do it right. Neihardt, an Indian lover
and an amateur historian, had taken off to get interviews about some
Indian rituals and ran into this mystic — who claimed to have a
message from the Great Spirit. Neihardt was entranced
immediately. This book, part memoir and part Book of
Revelations, was the result.
Unfortunately, Neihardt just
couldn't keep himself from a slice of prophet pie. As a writer
I sympathize with him greatly (after all, not all great prophets give
messages inspiringly),
but the introduction and footnotes make it clear that many of the
passages of Black Elk's book weren't stated by Black Elk in the
transcripts, and in fact were insertions by Neihardt himself.
And I mean many passages. Whole paragraphs. The most
quoted line from the entire book, according to the footnotes.
He put little embellishments here and there, which clarify the story
and make it fun, but which in the end make you wonder: did you go to
a man touched by God, or to a man who was desperate to make one?
The
truth is, Black Elk
Speaks is a mixed
bag. If the stories herein are true, many of which are an
important and interesting part of our history, Black Elk was given
visions of a Biblical quality — psychedelic in the extreme,
with horses whose nostrils had lightning in them, and winds from the
east bringing X and other such symbols. He was transported to a world
(as he says) behind this
world: a place which is more real than this place, and which
signified things which were, and are, and are yet to come. So
far, so good.
However some of these
inspirations, and I would argue the more important ones, were of a
different nature. Aside from apocalyptic visions, Black Elk had
many premonitions. He described them as queer
feelings, but
whatever happened, he began getting messages from animals and such
that danger was on the way — and he got them so frequently and so
accurately that people began to believe in him. These people
included those least likely, at least in our Western tradition, to
take a holy man seriously: his own family, whom he saved on multiple
occasions by predicting what was about to happen. I hesitate to
call this powers.
He was spoken to, and he took the voices seriously.
Holy
men are an interesting lot. First off, Black Elk was glad he
went blind so that he could focus on "reality” — not a bad
choice for a man who saw too many bad things and had dreams of
something better. What were these dreams? I haven't
finished the whole book*, but it appears that after all the bloodshed
and swindling and failure**, he saw his people unified and led, in a
holy way, back to a place of glory and rest. Not too unlike the
Hebrew prophets in exile in Babylon. Christ says it
is hard for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
Partly because, as James says, rich men are too busy ruining life for
the rest of us. Partly because, being satisfied here on earth,
they refuse to turn their eyes skyward.
Today Black Elk
would be labeled by professionals a schizophrenic**** and
put on meds, but I think a dozen successful prophecies, confirmed by
friends and family, puts him securely out of this range. At
least it does with me. And even if his last prophecies, the
unfulfilled ones, are outlandish and unlikely, does it matter?
John's revelation has inspired millions of Christians to get through
their ordeals — and if not through the
end of the world,
then certainly the more horrible ends of theirs. It might come
true today but it hasn't for the last two-thousand years, and that's
the point. An unfulfilled prophecy is the only prophecy you can
look forward to. Black
Elk Speaks gives hope
to his Indian brethren, and asks them to dream of themselves more
nobly. We only wonder why they prefer this over the Bible,
which is a finer, far deeper book in general, and furthermore whether
they were inspired by Black Elk — or whether they were led by
Neihardt, the typewriting honky.
Yours,
-J
March
19th,
2020
*Is
it fair that I've reviewed this book before finishing it? No —
but is it fair that I should finish it if it doesn't inspire me?
What I got out of this book — the reminder that there's a life
beyond what we know, and we should listen hard for God, and that we
can be blinded by the lust
of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life —
this was good enough for me, and most of this book is memoir anyway:
interesting, but uninspiring. Certainly not inspiring enough to
be the one book Indians have for a Bible.
This being said
I've followed Montaigne's way by accident. He said when
I was young I read for ostentation; in the middle years, for wisdom;
in later life for fun.
I'm square in the middle years, apparently. The book was fun —
but nowhere near as profitable as Montaigne.
**When I say
bloodshed and robbery, I mean from both the Indians and the
Americans. Neihardt's interpolations focus, many times, on the
injustices committed against Indians — but Black Elk's own words
testify of their own injustices against their "brethren."
For one thing, despite Black Elk's self-portrayal of oneness with
nature and Indians, women, even the women of your own tribe, are
viewed as property, and can be kidnapped and kept for life if you're
hot-headed enough for them. Second, the warpath, or the
organized attempt to kill people of a different group, can be waged
by two or even one person against an enemy you're not currently at
war with — an act known in all civilized countries as murder.
Third, prisoners of war and other such unfortunates are killed off
cruelly, and with laughter.
This being said, Black Elk,
and usually Neihardt speaking for him, makes some declarations that
white people are liars. Particularly about land, which Black
Elk's Lakotas were promised as
long as the grass grows green.
This proves to me that Neihardt himself was a lousy white man. Black Elk, of course, had good reason to not know why white men promised one thing and eight years later did another. But Neihardt had no excuse, and could have explained it easily. He could have told Black Elk that eight years could mean a total change in administration, and that the man who promised something probably wasn't the man who broke it. He could have said that not all white men were the same, or wanted the same things, or agreed about the things other whites said. He could have told Black Elk that there wasn't one white nation; and that the United States was a series of governments many times at odds with one another, and that the fight between the states and the feds is both constant and confusing.
The red man was split into
tribes, sometimes at peace and other times at odds. But nobody
(including God) told Black Elk that white men were split into
religions and classes and governments and cultures, and that all of
these could exist under the same flag: that German settlers weren't
like the Scots-Irish, and New York produced men wildly different from
Kentucky's — and that knowing the difference as an Indian is a
life-saver.
Beside this, T.R. Fehrenbach explains in Lone
Star what Black Elk
decribes in his memoirs — that American settlers usually show up
well before the soldiers. The Spaniards, who owned most of the
New World before we got here, had no such pioneer instinct. The
land was claimed by the crown, and a few thousand settlers, granted
land by the state, "populated" Texas, Arizona, New Mexico,
and California. I repeat, only a few thousand. There was
little growth and little migration. Conquest, at least
nominally, preceded settlement.
But the Anglo Saxons did
things backwards. The Anglos had established the east coast,
and our Scots-Irish immigrants, peoples totally indifferent to and
oftentimes ignorant of American law, forged well ahead of the
American border. They saw open, undeveloped land and they took
it. They were enterprising, and hardy, and violent, and
rude-mannered, and self-reliant. And the government, oftentimes
powerless to stop them, found itself powerless to ignore them.
First off whites were getting
in wars with the Indians, and the atrocity stories were whipping
other whites into a frenzy. Second there was the threat of new
nations forming on the fringes. Third there was the opportunity
of an easy expansion. The established white nations, sitting
easy on the east, saw wild lands cleared and wild men chased out.
When the wild men were chased out the "respectable folk"
moved in. By the time the government arrived — many times to
clean up a mess — it merely put an official stamp on a civilization
already in existence.
Black Elk saw it but he couldn't
explain it. White men like Neihardt could explain it but they
didn't care to. Thus the white man isn't a liar. At least
not in whole. The Indian never evolved his understanding of
white men: that whites aren't all the same, and that the reason for
our success is our inability to control one another — oftentimes
intentionally.
****We're now finding out that
schizophrenics are different across nations. Yes, they hear
voices — but what do the voices say? Rebecca Solnit, in her
otherwise idiotic book Men
Explain Things to Me,
says that schizos in India hear their ancestors telling them to clean
house, and Americans hear voices telling them to kill strangers.
Solnit believes it's a result, more than anything else, of our culture. You have a man like Black Elk, close to friends and family his whole life, covered by sky and treading on grass, and the voices tell him a great wind is coming from the East, and the thunder beings are marching from the West; and he sees, not too unlike his real life, great migrations of unified peoples.
In America, the schizo is shut up in his house, probably with a family that's totally disordered and borderline abusive. He fills his mind with the TV, where he'll see a hundred thousand-plus outright murders before he turns 18. Then he gets treated like garbage because he's a misfit, and the voices take what's in him, and he blows away a middle-school.
Have you read Empire of the Summer Moon? I recommend it highly. Keep up the interesting, thought provoking articles.
ReplyDeleteI own it, but haven't gotten to it yet. So many books and so little time!
Delete